The Controller of the Government of Andalusia between 2000 and 2010, Manuel Gomez Martinez, has sent a letter to the commission of inquiry into the ERE in which dismantles the version built to exonerate current President Andalusia, José Antonio Grin. In the document, the former controller replicates some of the statements of the President of the Junta de AndalucÃa to the commission of inquiry and said that if anyone had to "grab the extinguisher" to douse the fire of the ERE, this was precisely Griñan as Minister of Finance. Blaming the intervention would, in his opinion, "infamous" and "grotesque." The purpose of the memorandum, received on Wednesday in Parliament and who has had access THE WORLD of Andalusia, is to clear any shadow of suspicion on the role of intervention and "define, clarify and refute" some of the interpretations made by others appearing on his statement to the commission of inquiry, especially ones whose author claims no appointment but satisfy Griñán. The president of the Andalusian testified before the commission of inquiry into questions of IU [page 20 of the minutes of his appearance]: "(…) not detected Intervention say fire. (…) If there Intervention detected fire would have been turned off, because they have the means. . . to put out fires. (…) The intervention, if it detects irregularities, fraud or impairment of public funds is one that has to give the alarm and arouse the proper procedure, "said Grin. Well, the former auditor notes that the author of these claims unknown section 110 of the Public Finance Act, which requires the employment minister, responsible hierarchical Working CEO that managed the slush fund, and counselor Treasury, as authorizing officer, to act in cases of impairment of funds. The law requires "not only to communicate the assumptions of impairment they know, but to take precautionary measures in defense of the rights of the Treasury." "In other words, says the Auditor-which should not only have been sounded but have caught fire extinguisher." In the time that audited the management of the Agency IDEA, paying of early retirement that adjudicated the Department of Employment, the auditor warned at least 15 times of irregularities in the proceedings and made their reports, three members without anyone adopt the recommendations . When the scandal broke, far from acknowledging that the auditor warned of what was happening, the PSOE clung to the view that the intervention did not warn of anything since its audits never reached the level of "performance report". Throughout the 63-page report, former auditor again insisted Intervention-General defended the same approach in its submissions to the report of the Chamber of Auditors on the ERE-that the report of action was inappropriate, since the I was being audited entity was the IDEA Agency and this is outside the scope of this report.
↧
